6 Dec 2008
Publicat de Florin Carata in Articole, reviews, teste | 0 comentarii
Review: eVGA 8800 GTX
Rezultate 3DMark 2003
Scalare CPU/p>
| ~E6300 | ~E6400 | ~E6600 | ~E6700 | ~X6800 | |
| Frecventa CPU | 1860 MHz | 2130 MHz | 2400 MHz | 2667 MHz | 2930 MHz |
| Frecventa CPU | 100% | 114.52% | 129.03% | 143.39% | 157.53% |
| 3DMark 2001 SE @ 575/900 | 100% | 102.81% | 104.85% | 106.44% | 107.83% |
| 3DMark 2001 SE @ 630/1000 | 100% | 102.9% | 105.11% | 107.11% | 108.49% |
| 3DMark 2001 SE @ 660/1000 | 100% | 102.91% | 105.25% | 107.11% | 108.68% |
Scalare GPU
| 575/900 | 630/1000 | 660/1000 | |
| Frecventa GPU | 575 MHz | 630 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Frecventa GPU | 100% | 109.57% | 114.78% |
| 3DMark 2003 ~E6300 | 100% | 106.77% | 109.84% |
| 3DMark 2003 ~E6400 | 100% | 106.87% | 109.94% |
| 3DMark 2003 @ ~E6600 | 100% | 107.03% | 110.25% |
| 3DMark 2003 @ ~E6700 | 100% | 107.45% | 110.53% |
| 3DMark 2003 @ ~X6800 | 100% | 107.42% | 110.7% |
Concluzii
3DMark 2003 este singurul benchmark de la Futuremark care isi merita pe deplin ‘3D’-ul din nume. Motivele sunt evidente: raportul (crestere performanta)/(crestere frecventa) pentru CPU este de 16.9% in timp ce raportul (crestere performanta)/(crestere frecventa) pentru GPU este de 71.82%. O situatie aproape inversa fata de 3DMark 2001 SE!
Niciun comentariu
Trackbacks/Pingbacks